pard3 (Novus Biologicals)
Structured Review
Pard3, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 11 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pard3/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 94 stars, based on 11 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Mouse germline cysts contain a fusome-like structure that mediates oocyte development"
Article Title: Mouse germline cysts contain a fusome-like structure that mediates oocyte development
Journal: eLife
doi: 10.7554/eLife.109358
Figure Legend Snippet: E12.5 Ovary stained for PARD3 in Red, EMA in Green and DAPI in Blue.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: E13.5 Ovary stained for GCNA in Blue, PARD3 in Red and EMA in Green.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: E13.5 Testis stained for GCNA in Blue, PARD3 in Red and EMA in Green.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: P0 wild-type ovary stained for GCNA in green and Pard3 in red.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: P0 Dazl + /- ovary stained for GCNA in green and Pard3 in red.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: P0 Dazl -/- ovary stained for GCNA in green and Pard3 in red.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A–B ) Pard3 associates with fusome as observed in E11.5-E13.5; Gonad stained for Pard3 (red), EMA (green) and DAPI (blue) ( A, A' ) and after rosette formation at E13.5 ( B, B' ). ( C-C' ) Ring canals (RACGAP, yellow) localize within the Pard3+ (red) apical domain in germ cells (GCNA, green). ( D ) A lineage-labeled E13.5 cyst (YFP, green); channels below show enrichment of Pard3 (red) with enriched fusome (EMA, gray). Graph: Quantification of Pard3 stained area colocalizing with large- ≥ 20 μm 2 and small <20 μm 2 fusome within lineage labeled cyst (Student’s t-test, N=13; *** p <0.001). ( E ) Xbp1 (green) enrichment in EMA (red) granule of E11.5 PGC. ( F–H ) scRNA-seq of E10.5-P5 gonad. UMAP of re-clustered germ cells at various stages ( F ), UMAP ( G ) UMI Feature Plot; NC = nurse cells. ( H ): UMAP with clusters labeled in ascending order of meiotic development. pre-meiotic (Pre-M), leptotene (Lp), zygotene (Zy), pachytene (Pa), diplotene (Dp), dictyate (Dc). ( I - I′ ) Bar plots: ( I ) Xbp1, Xbp1-target expression plots. ( I' ) Genes orthologous to fusome components. Scale bars: 10 μm ( A–C, E ), 20 μm ( D ).
Techniques Used: Staining, Labeling, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) E13.5 ovaries stained for GCNA (blue), EMA (green) and PARD3 (red). ( B ) Lineage labeled E13.5 ovary stained for YFP (green), GCNA (blue), PARD3 (red), and EMA (gray). ( C ) Zoomed images of E13.5 gonad stained for RACGAP (green) and Pard3 (red). Scale bar = 10 μm ( A and B ), 20 μm ( C ).
Techniques Used: Staining, Labeling
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Dnmt3a and EMA levels at E12.5. Dnmt3a levels are reduced in wild-type (WT) compared to Dazl -/- germ cells. Graph - Dnmt3a fluorescent levels within germ cells as normalized with somatic cells in WT versus Dazl mutant gonad. (N=10 tissues; **p<0.05). ( B ) Ring canals are smaller and defective in E13.5 Dazl -/- cysts compared to WT. (N=44; **p<0.05). ( C ) scRNA-seq of E11.5 and E12.5 WT and Dazl -/- gonad germ cells. UMAP. Germ cell clusters overlapped at E11.5 and segregated at E12 of WT and Dazl -/- . ( C’ ) Xbp1, Xbp1 targets, and fusome orthologs in WT vs Dazl -/- germ cells. ( D ) Validation of IRE1-Xbp1 assay: Ovarian cells visualized by fluorescent microscopy showing GCNA labeled bigger germ cells with higher Xbp1 fluorescence than smaller somatic cells ( D’-D”’ ) IRE1-Xbp1 assay comparing SSEA1+germ vs SSEA1− somatic cells at E11.5 and WT vs Dazl -/- germ cells at E12.5. ( D’ ; 6 experiments: ~32 mice, ≥5 mice, and ≥20 ovaries per experiment, D”-D”’ ; 3 experiments: ~40 mice, ≥5 mice, and ≥25 ovaries per experiments, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.005, ****p<0.0001) ( E - E″ ) Proteasome activity comparing SSEA1+germ vs SSEA1− somatic cells at E11.5 and WT vs Dazl -/- germ cells at E12.5. (N=3 biological assays with ~35–60 E11.5 ovary per assay and ~25–28 E12.5 ovaries were used per assay. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.005, ****p<0.0001) ( F ) Golgi fragmentation in E12.5 Dazl -/- germ cells stained with golgi marker Gs28 (red), EMA (green) and DAPI (blue). Graph: germ cell percent with fragmented Golgi in wild-type versus Dazl mutant mouse gonad (Student’s t-test: N=16, ***p<0.005) ( F’ ) Failure of E13.5 Dazl -/- germ cells to form EMA (gray) rosettes or enrich Pard3 (red). ( G ) Dazl -/- effects on fusome, Golgi and Pard3. ( H ) Proposed function of fusome-mediated regulation of ERAD-UPR proteostasis. Scale bar: 10 μm (except zoomed in 2 μm).
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Biomarker Discovery, Microscopy, Labeling, Fluorescence, Activity Assay, Staining, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) E17.5 ovary stained for WGA, GCNA, and TEX14. ( A’ ) E17.5 ovary stained for GCNA, RACGAP, and PARD3; Graph: Fusome volume and Pard3 Stained area versus ring canal number N=65 (Fusome volume; N=51 (Pard3); ANOVA, ***p<0.005, ****p<0.0001). ( B-B′ ) E18.5 ovary shows WGA-Fusome/PARD3 enrichment in large medullary oocytes vs smaller nurse cells; line: medulla/cortex boundary; dotted circle: large medullary oocytes; white dotted area: small nurse cells. The area marked as a white dotted rectangle is shown as a zoomed inset (white arrow). Black arrow in inset: WGA stained fusome; Graph compares fusome volume and Pard3 stained area versus Germ cell nucleus diameter (N=54 (WGA), N=37(PARD3); Student’s paired t-test, *p<0.05, ****p<0.001). ( C ) Single cell lineage labeled E18.5 ovary stained for YFP, DAPI, WGA, and GCNA Graph: Within single-cell lineage-labeled E18.5 ovary-Fusome volume difference according to germ cell nucleus size (N=10; ****p<0.0001). ( D ) Single cell lineage labeled E18.5 ovary stained for YFP, PARD3, and GCNA Graph: Within single-cell lineage-labeled E18.5 ovary- difference in PARD3 stained area according to germ cell nucleus size (N=10; ***p<0.005). ( G-G′ ) Dazl +/- E18.5 ovary- Fusome (WGA) and Pard3 enrichment failure in medullary oocytes (GCNA). Graph: Fusome volume in potential oocytes, i.e., bigger germ cells with nucleus diameter d ≥12 μm in wild-type versus Dazl +/- mutant F-F″ . Organelle enrichment analysis: E18.5 (WT- F - F’ , and Dazl +/- ovary F” ) stained for WGA, mitochondrial marker ATP5a and GCNA ( F and F” ). ( F’ ) - Electron microscopy (EM) image of Golgi-rich Fusome (arrow) surrounded by mitochondria. ( G-G′ ) Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-mitochondria association in E18.5 WT ovary: G-EM image of ER tubules (arrow) wrapping mitochondria and G’ - E18.5 WT ovary- GCNA, ER, and Mitochondria tracker staining. Scale bars: 20 μm ( A-E , G-G′ , F,F” , G′ ), 5 μm ( B-, B′ - right most inset panel), 0.5 μm (EM images F′ , G ).
Techniques Used: Staining, Single Cell, Labeling, Mutagenesis, Marker, Electron Microscopy

